The Dysology Hypothesis

Letting scholars get away with publishing fallacies and myths signals to others the existence of topics where guardians of good scholarship might be less capable than elsewhere. Such dysology then serves as an allurement to poor scholars to disseminate existing myths and fallacies and to create and publish their own in these topic areas, which leads to a downward spiral of diminishing veracity on particular topics.

Saturday, 8 November 2014

Accidental Knowledge Contamination Versus Science Fraud: The Mysterious case of Wallace & Darwin v Matthew


Listen to the interview asking what we should make of "The New Data" on Darwin v Matthew; Here