Real Scientists Trumpet their errors from the rooftops. So what does that make Richard Dawkins?

In light of new data that disproves prior ideas and conclusions, real scientists (as opposed to fools) trumpet their errors from the rooftops. So come on - arch critic of fools - Richard Dawkins. What do you have to say? We're waiting Richard.

What about you @RichardDawkins? You stupidly wrote that Matthew should have trumpeted his breakthrough from the rooftops BEFORE Darwin plagiarized it, at a time when he was being brute censored for trying to do just that. Will you now be a real scientist and admit YOUR error? https://t.co/tMKg1GhTyN

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 3, 2020

Charles Darwin to be Beautified by the Pope?

If there actually is a "far smarter than thou" God, then it might just be moving in mysterious ways, its purifying light of the horrible New Data wonders to perform. In which improbable case, we might ask: is Dr Richard Dawkins newly revealed as "God's" unwitting Zombie Scientist?

We can never accurately predict what will happen next in human affairs. It is not beyond the bounds of reason that the newly urgent need for Darwinist miracle belief in their namesake's highly improbable "independent discovery" (immaculate conception) of Patrick Matthew's prior published hypothesis will teach scientists that today they really do have so much in common with necessary christian belief in miracles.

The Patrick Matthew Supermyth

Check out Dawkins' video on Patrick Matthew - its full of pseudo-scholarly Darwinist mythmongery. Please read my Best Thinking blog to see the arguments based on facts - as opposed to adoration blinded Darwinist rhetoric - and to follow the debate on the Discovery of the World's Greatest Science Fraud.